Monday, January 5, 2015

2015 Ford Mustang lost power with the use of RON87


2015 Ford Mustang with a 2.3-liter EcoBoost engine four-cylinder is a pack that is strong enough on paper. With 310 horse power and 320 pound-foot of torque, it gives the figure a better performance than the 3.7-liter V6 Mustang berenjin, along with fuel economy better fire as an additional advantage.

However, if you thought about to buy a Mustang in the United States, you may need to remember his intention over the fire gemarkan premium materials, namely 93 Octane (RON 93). Yes, in the US premium RON93 is material fire, while fire Premium materials in Malaysia is RON 97 and RON 98. Not hairanlah why muscle car engine sebegini usually large mere.

Turn to the story above, the latest Mustang may poured RON 87, but you will find berkurangan power. Although bagaiamana else, this power reduction is not something surprising with the use of low-octane fire, kerana manuals Ford exercises no call (which diperolehi by Mustang6G). Hmm ....




According to this document, the EcoBoost 2.3 liter engine capable of producing 275 horsepower and 300 pound-feet of torque when running with octane fuel is lower. The reduction was estimated to be approximately 11.3% compared to when using fuels that suggested Ford, which is the minimum RON 93. Interestingly, according Mustang 6G, the above fact somewhat better than expected Ford, as an engineer reportedly said Ford will power down about 13 percent with no change in peak torque.

In an interview with Automotive News, Paul Seredynski from the Ford powertrain communications, denied the facts contained in the manual mentioned above. Although he could not confirm specific reductions listed for EcoBoost Mustang, he said "torque unchanged" with low octane fuel consumption. He speculated that this manual page "likely generated before the engine is confirmed," and because it shows the wrong number. Serendynski confirm that Ford recommends the use RON93, and like all modern engines, car software will adapt if it is lower octane fuel is used. However, Serendynski approved a sump

No comments:

Post a Comment